You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/74303
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorda Silva, Melissa Aline-
dc.contributor.authorRangel, Patrícia Maria-
dc.contributor.authorBarcellos, Daphne Câmara-
dc.contributor.authorPagani, Clovis-
dc.contributor.authorTorres, Carlos Rocha Gomes-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-27T11:27:32Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T18:41:40Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-27T11:27:32Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T18:41:40Z-
dc.date.issued2013-01-01-
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1261-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Contemporary Dental Practice, v. 14, n. 1, p. 9-13, 2013.-
dc.identifier.issn1526-3711-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/74303-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/74303-
dc.description.abstractAim: This study evaluates bond strength between dentin and composite using adhesives with different solvents to dry and wet dentin. Materials and methods: Ninety bovine incisors were used; the vestibular surfaces were worn by the exposure of an area with a diameter of 4 mm of dentin. The specimens were divided into 6 groups, according to the type of adhesive used and hydratation stals: Group SB-wet: Single Bond 2 in wet dentin, Group SBdry: Single Bond 2 in dry dentin, Group SL-wet: Solobond M in wet dentin, Group SL-dry: Solobond M in dentin dry. Group XPwet: XP Bond in wet dentin, Group XP-dry: XP Bond in dentin dry. They were cut to obtain specimens in the shape of stick with 1 × 1 mm and subjected to microtensile test in universal testing machine with a cross speed of 1mm/min. The data were analyzed with ANOVA and Tukey's tests (5%). Results: ANOVA showed significant differences for surface treatment and interaction, but no difference was found for adhesive factor. The Tukey's test showed that the samples with wet dentin shown higher values of bond strength. Conclusion: The adhesive did not influence in the bond strength. The groups with wet dentin showed higher values of bond strength than groups with dry dentin.en
dc.format.extent9-13-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.sourceScopus-
dc.subjectAdhesive systems-
dc.subjectBond strength-
dc.subjectDentin-
dc.subjectAdper single bond 2-
dc.subjectdental material-
dc.subjectdentin bonding agent-
dc.subjectfiltek Z350-
dc.subjectphosphoric acid-
dc.subjectresin-
dc.subjectSolobond M-
dc.subjectsolvent-
dc.subjecttooth cement-
dc.subjectwater-
dc.subjectXP Bond-
dc.subjectXP-Bond-
dc.subjectadhesion-
dc.subjectanimal-
dc.subjectcattle-
dc.subjectchemistry-
dc.subjectclassification-
dc.subjectcomparative study-
dc.subjectdental acid etching-
dc.subjectdental bonding-
dc.subjectdental curing light-
dc.subjectdental procedure-
dc.subjectdental surgery-
dc.subjectdentin-
dc.subjectdesiccation-
dc.subjectequipment-
dc.subjectmaterials testing-
dc.subjectmechanical stress-
dc.subjectmethodology-
dc.subjectpolymerization-
dc.subjectrandomization-
dc.subjecttemperature-
dc.subjecttime-
dc.subjectultrastructure-
dc.subjectAcid Etching, Dental-
dc.subjectAdhesiveness-
dc.subjectAnimals-
dc.subjectCattle-
dc.subjectComposite Resins-
dc.subjectCuring Lights, Dental-
dc.subjectDental Bonding-
dc.subjectDental Cements-
dc.subjectDental Materials-
dc.subjectDental Stress Analysis-
dc.subjectDentin-Bonding Agents-
dc.subjectDesiccation-
dc.subjectMaterials Testing-
dc.subjectPhosphoric Acids-
dc.subjectPolymerization-
dc.subjectRandom Allocation-
dc.subjectSmear Layer-
dc.subjectSolvents-
dc.subjectStress, Mechanical-
dc.subjectTemperature-
dc.subjectTime Factors-
dc.subjectWater-
dc.titleBond strength of adhesive systems with different solvents to dry and wet dentinen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Restorative Dentistry Clinical Research Academic Group, São José dos Campos School of Dentistry São Paulo State University, UNESP-
dc.description.affiliationClinical Research Academic Group São José dos Campos School of Dentistry São Paulo State University, UNESP-
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Restorative Dentistry São José dos Campos School of Dentistry São Paulo State University, UNESP-
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Restorative Dentistry Clinical Research Academic Group, São José dos Campos School of Dentistry São Paulo State University, UNESP-
dc.description.affiliationUnespClinical Research Academic Group São José dos Campos School of Dentistry São Paulo State University, UNESP-
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Restorative Dentistry São José dos Campos School of Dentistry São Paulo State University, UNESP-
dc.identifier.doi10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1261-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso aberto-
dc.identifier.file2-s2.0-84876835758.pdf-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Contemporary Dental Practice-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84876835758-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.