You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/74582
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGuastaldi, Fernando P. S.-
dc.contributor.authorYoo, Daniel-
dc.contributor.authorMarin, Charles-
dc.contributor.authorJimbo, Ryo-
dc.contributor.authorTovar, Nick-
dc.contributor.authorZanetta-Barbosa, Darceny-
dc.contributor.authorCoelho, Paulo G.-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-27T11:28:24Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T18:44:24Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-27T11:28:24Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T18:44:24Z-
dc.date.issued2013-02-11-
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/354125-
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Biomaterials, v. 2013.-
dc.identifier.issn1687-8787-
dc.identifier.issn1687-8795-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/74582-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/74582-
dc.description.abstractThe surface energy of the implant surface has an impact on osseointegration. In this study, 2 surfaces: nonwashed resorbable blasting media (NWRBM; control) and Ar-based nonthermal plasma 30 days (Plasma 30 days; experimental), were investigated with a focus on the surface energy. The surface energy was characterized by the Owens-Wendt-Rabel-Kaelble method and the chemistry by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). Five adult beagle dogs received 8 implants (n = 2 per surface, per tibia). After 2 weeks, the animals were euthanized, and half of the implants (n = 20) were removal torqued and the other half were histologically processed (n = 20). The bone-to-implant contact (BIC) and bone area fraction occupancy (BAFO) were evaluated on the histologic sections. The XPS analysis showed peaks of C, Ca, O, and P for the control and experimental surfaces. While no significant difference was observed for BIC parameter (P > 0.75), a higher level for torque (P < 0.02) and BAFO parameter (P < 0.01) was observed for the experimental group. The surface elemental chemistry was modified by the plasma and lasted for 30 days after treatment resulting in improved biomechanical fixation and bone formation at 2 weeks compared to the control group. © 2013 Fernando P. S. Guastaldi et al.en
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.sourceScopus-
dc.titlePlasma treatment maintains surface energy of the implant surface and enhances osseointegrationen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionNew York University-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.contributor.institutionUNIGRANRIO-
dc.contributor.institutionMalmö University-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Uberlândia-
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Biomaterials and Biomimetics College of Dentistry New York University, 345 East 24th Street, New York, NY 10010-
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Surgery and Integrated Clinic São Paulo State University, 16015 Araçatuba, SP-
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Postgraduate Dentistry UNIGRANRIO, 25071 Duque de Caxias, RJ-
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Prosthodontics Faculty of Odontology Malmö University, 205 06 Malmö-
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Implantology University of Uberlândia, 38408 Uberlândia, MG-
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Surgery and Integrated Clinic São Paulo State University, 16015 Araçatuba, SP-
dc.identifier.doi10.1155/2013/354125-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso aberto-
dc.identifier.file2-s2.0-84873357563.pdf-
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Biomaterials-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84873357563-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.