You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/74675
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGuerreiro-Tanomaru, Juliane Maria-
dc.contributor.authorDe Faria-Júnior, Norberto Batista-
dc.contributor.authorDuarte, Marco Antônio Húngaro-
dc.contributor.authorOrdinola-Zapata, Ronald-
dc.contributor.authorGraeff, Márcia Sirlene Zardin-
dc.contributor.authorTanomaru-Filho, Mário-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-27T11:28:34Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T18:44:58Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-27T11:28:34Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T18:44:58Z-
dc.date.issued2013-03-01-
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2012.09.027-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Endodontics, v. 39, n. 3, p. 346-350, 2013.-
dc.identifier.issn0099-2399-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/74675-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/74675-
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: The aim of this study was to compare Enterococcus faecalis biofilm formation on different substrates. Methods: Cell culture plates containing growth medium and E. faecalis (ATCC 29212) were used to grow biofilm on bovine dentin, gutta-percha, hydroxyapatite, or bovine bone. Substrates were incubated at 37°C for 14 or 21 days, and the medium was changed every 48 hours. After the growth induction periods, specimens (n = 5 per group and per induction period) were stained by using Live/Dead, and the images were analyzed under a confocal microscope. The total biovolume (μm3), live bacteria biovolume (μm3), and substrate coverage (%) were quantified by using the BioImage-L software. Results obtained were analyzed by nonparametric tests (P =.05). Results: Biofilm formation was observed in all groups. Gutta-percha had the lowest total biovolume at 14 days (P <.05) and hydroxyapatite the highest at 21 days (P <.05). No significant difference was observed in green biovolume at 14 days. At 21 days, however, hydroxyapatite had the highest volume (P <.05). The percentages of coverage were similar among all substrates at 21 days (P >.05), but at 14 days, bovine bone presented the highest coverage (P <.05). Conclusions: E. faecalis was capable of forming biofilm on all substrates during both growth periods; hydroxyapatite presented the highest rates of biofilm formation. The type of substrate influenced the biofilm characteristics, according to the parameters evaluated. © 2013 American Association of Endodontists.en
dc.format.extent346-350-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.sourceScopus-
dc.subjectBiofilm-
dc.subjectconfocal microscopy-
dc.subjectEnterococcus faecalis-
dc.titleComparative analysis of Enterococcus faecalis biofilm formation on different substratesen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)-
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Restorative Dentistry Araraquara Dental School UNESP-Univ Estadual Paulista, Rua Humaitá, 1680, 14801-903 Araraquara, SP-
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Restorative Dentistry Bauru Dental School USP-University of São Paulo, Bauru, São Paulo-
dc.description.affiliationIntegrated Research Center Bauru Dental School USP-University of São Paulo, Bauru, São Paulo-
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Restorative Dentistry Araraquara Dental School UNESP-Univ Estadual Paulista, Rua Humaitá, 1680, 14801-903 Araraquara, SP-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.joen.2012.09.027-
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000316031200006-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Endodontics-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84873719314-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.