You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/74725
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMoreno, Amália-
dc.contributor.authorGoiato, Marcelo Coelho-
dc.contributor.authorSantos, Daniela Micheline dos-
dc.contributor.authorHaddad, Marcela F.-
dc.contributor.authorPesqueira, Aldieris Alves-
dc.contributor.authorBannwart, Lisiane C.-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-27T11:28:36Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T18:45:06Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-27T11:28:36Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T18:45:06Z-
dc.date.issued2013-03-01-
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-2358.2012.00642.x-
dc.identifier.citationGerodontology, v. 30, n. 1, p. 32-39, 2013.-
dc.identifier.issn0734-0664-
dc.identifier.issn1741-2358-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/74725-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/74725-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Ocular prosthesis materials should have specific properties for their indication and durability; therefore, it is important to investigate their physical behaviour when affected by several disinfectants. Objectives: This study evaluated the influence of different disinfecting solutions on the microhardness and surface roughness of acrylic resins for ocular prosthesis. Materials and Methods: Fifty samples simulating ocular prostheses were fabricated with N1 resin and colourless resin and divided (n = 10) according to the disinfectant used: neutral soap, Opti-free, Efferdent, 1% hypochlorite (HYC) and 4% chlorhexidine (CHX). Samples were stored in saline solution at 37°C and disinfected during 120 days. Both microhardness and roughness were investigated before, after 60 days and 120 days of disinfection and storage. Microhardness was measured using a microhardner and the roughness with a roughness device. Results: N1 resin showed lower microhardness when compared with colourless resin (p < 0.05). HYC and CHX groups exhibited the highest change of microhardness and roughness values (p < 0.05). An increase in roughness and reduction in microhardness of ocular acrylic resins were observed after both periods of disinfection and storage (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Both disinfection/storage periods affected the microhardness and roughness values of the samples. © 2012 The Gerodontology Society and John Wiley & Sons A/S.en
dc.format.extent32-39-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.sourceScopus-
dc.subjectacrylic resins-
dc.subjectartificial eye-
dc.subjectdisinfection-
dc.subjectmaxillofacial prosthesis-
dc.subjectphysical properties-
dc.titleEffect of different disinfectants on the microhardness and roughness of acrylic resins for ocular prosthesisen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Faculty of Dentistry of Araçatuba Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), São Paulo-
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Faculty of Dentistry of Araçatuba Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), São Paulo-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1741-2358.2012.00642.x-
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000314750900006-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito-
dc.relation.ispartofGerodontology-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84873439097-
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-3800-3050pt
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.