You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/74762
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorIten, Heyo Van-
dc.contributor.authorLeme, Juliana de M.-
dc.contributor.authorMarques, Antonio C.-
dc.contributor.authorSimões, Marcello G.-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-27T11:28:37Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T18:45:11Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-27T11:28:37Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T18:45:11Z-
dc.date.issued2013-03-01-
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.4202/app.2011.0096-
dc.identifier.citationActa Palaeontologica Polonica, v. 58, n. 1, p. 111-113, 2013.-
dc.identifier.issn0567-7920-
dc.identifier.issn1732-2421-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/74762-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/74762-
dc.description.abstractIn a letter to Nature (February, 2011), Xunlai Yuan and collaborators recorded carbon compression fossils from black shales of the Lantian Formation (Ediacaran), southern Anhui Province, South China. The new fossils, described under five morphological types (Types A to E), exhibit degrees of morphological differentiation suggesting that they were multicellular eukaryotes. Some of the Lantian macrofossils were interpreted as algae, but others are of unknown affinities. For reasons noted in this discussion, Type A fossils attracted our particular attention, and we suggest an alternative interpretation of their affinities. According to our view, some of them (at least those with three faces and no globose holdfast at their base) may represent conulariid cnidarians or close medusozoan relatives. The undistorted organism probably was a three-sided cone in life. We believe that our suggested alternative interpretations of the anatomy and affinities of the fossils in question can be useful in guiding future research on the oldest currently known fossil assemblage of multicellular organisms. Copyright © 2012.en
dc.format.extent111-113-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.sourceScopus-
dc.subjectblack shale-
dc.subjectEdiacaran-
dc.subjecteukaryote-
dc.subjectfossil-
dc.subjectmorphology-
dc.subjectAnhui-
dc.subjectChina-
dc.titleAlternative interpretations of some earliest ediacaran fossils from Chinaen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionHanover College-
dc.contributor.institutionCincinnati Museum Center-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.description.affiliationDeportment of Geology Hanover College, Hanover, IN 47243-
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Invertebrate Paleontology Cincinnati Museum Center, 1301 Western Avenue, Cincinnati, OH 45203-
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Sedimentary and Environmental Geology University of São Paulo, 05580-080, São Paulo, SP-
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Zoology University of São Paulo, Rua do Matão, Travessa 14, 101, 05508-090, São Paulo, SP-
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Zoology São Paulo State University, 18.618-000, Botucatu, SP-
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Zoology São Paulo State University, 18.618-000, Botucatu, SP-
dc.identifier.doi10.4202/app.2011.0096-
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000318462900010-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso aberto-
dc.identifier.file2-s2.0-84875299586.pdf-
dc.relation.ispartofActa Palaeontologica Polonica-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84875299586-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.