You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/7550
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNascimento, M. S.-
dc.contributor.authorSilva, N.-
dc.contributor.authorCatanozi, MPLM-
dc.contributor.authorSilva, K. C.-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-20T13:24:24Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T16:45:07Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-20T13:24:24Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T16:45:07Z-
dc.date.issued2003-09-01-
dc.identifierhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14503728-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Food Protection. Des Moines: Int Associação Food Protection, v. 66, n. 9, p. 1697-1700, 2003.-
dc.identifier.issn0362-028X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/7550-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/7550-
dc.description.abstractIn this study, water and eight sanitizing solutions (vinegar at 6, 25, and 50%; acetic acid at 2 and 4%; peracetic acid at 80 ppm, sodium hypochlorite at 200 ppm, and sodium dichloroisocyanurate at 200 ppm) were compared in terms of their effectiveness against the natural microbiota of lettuce. All of the samples were kept in contact with the sanitizing solutions for 15 min, and the effectiveness of a sanitizing agent was evaluated on the basis of the number of decimal reductions of the total aerobic mesophilic count, the mold and yeast count, the total coliform count, and the Escherichia coli count. The average initial levels of these organisms in the samples were 6.94 log(10) CFU/g for aerobic mesophilic microorganisms, 5.62 log(10) CFU/g for molds and yeasts, and 3.25 log(10) CFU/g for total coliforms. of 10 samples analyzed, only 4 contained E. coli, and the average initial level of this microorganism in these 4 samples was 1.64 log(10) CFU/g. Salmonella was not detected in any of the samples tested. The decimal reductions of the populations of aerobic mesophilic microorganisms, molds and yeasts, total coliforms, and E. coli were 0.78, 0.87, 0.82, and >0.14 log(10) CFU/g, respectively, in water; 2.89, >3.41, >2.21, and >0.26 log(10) CFU/g, respectively, in 50% vinegar; 2.42, >3.20, >1.99, and >0.26 log(10) CFU/g, respectively, in 25% vinegar; 1.83, 2.57, 1.58, and >0.26 log(10) CFU/g, respectively, in 6% vinegar; 3.91, >3.58, >2.25, and >0.26 log(10) CFU/g, respectively, in 4% acetic acid; 3.37, >3.53, >2.25, and >0.26 log(10) CFU/g, respectively, in 2% acetic acid; 1.85, 2,32, 1.44, and >0.20 log(10) CFU/g, respectively, in 80 ppm of peracetic acid; 2.63, 2.75, 1.91, and >0.26 log(10) CFU/g, respectively, in 200 ppm of sodium hypochlorite; and 3.23, >3.08, >1.95, and >0.26 log(10) CFU/g, respectively, in 200 ppm of sodium dichloroisocyanurate. Statistical analysis of the results showed that the effectiveness levels for all of the sanitizing agents tested were equivalent to or higher than that for sodium hypochlorite at 200 ppm.en
dc.format.extent1697-1700-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherInt Assoc Food Protection-
dc.sourceWeb of Science-
dc.titleEffects of different disinfection treatments on the natural microbiota of lettuceen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionInst Tecnol Alimentos-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.description.affiliationInst Tecnol Alimentos, BR-13073001 Campinas, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUniv Estadual Paulista, Fac Ciências Farmaceut, Dept Alimentos & Nutr, BR-14801000 Araraquara, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUnespUniv Estadual Paulista, Fac Ciências Farmaceut, Dept Alimentos & Nutr, BR-14801000 Araraquara, Brazil-
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000185213000029-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Food Protection-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.