You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/75814
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHayacibara, Roberto M.-
dc.contributor.authorGonçalves, Camila S.-
dc.contributor.authorGarcez-Filho, João-
dc.contributor.authorMagro Filho, Osvaldo-
dc.contributor.authorEsper, Helen-
dc.contributor.authorHayacibara, Mitsue F.-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-27T11:29:50Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T18:50:36Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-27T11:29:50Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T18:50:36Z-
dc.date.issued2013-07-01-
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02461.x-
dc.identifier.citationClinical Oral Implants Research, v. 24, n. 7, p. 806-811, 2013.-
dc.identifier.issn0905-7161-
dc.identifier.issn1600-0501-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/75814-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/75814-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Dental implants, indicated for re-establishing both mastigatory and aesthetic functions, can be placed in the sockets immediately after tooth extraction. Most studies investigate the anterior and upper regions of the dental arch, whereas few examine longitudinal appraisal of immediate implant installation in the mandibular molar region. Objective: The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the success rate of immediate dental implants placement in mandibular molars within a follow-up period as long as 8 years. Materials and methods: Seventy-four mandibular molar implants after non-traumatic tooth extraction between 2002 and 2008 were examined in the study. All implants were evaluated radiographically immediately after prosthesis placement, 1 year after implantation, and by the end of the experimental period, in 2010. Clinical evaluation was done according to [Albrektsson et al. (1986) The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, 1, 11-25] success criteria for marginal bone loss. The mean bone losses, calculated as the difference between the final evaluation measures and those taken by the end of the first year of implant, were compared using Kruskal-Wallis test with a significance level of 5%. Results: All implants presented clinical and radiographic stable conditions, that is, 100% success rate. Significant bone loss was not found between final evaluation and that of the first functional year (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Immediate implant placement of mandibular molars proved to be a viable surgical treatment given the high success rate up to 8 years after implantation. © 2012 John Wiley & Sons A/S.en
dc.format.extent806-811-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.sourceScopus-
dc.subjectExtensive follow-up-
dc.subjectExtraction socket-
dc.subjectImmediate implant-
dc.subjectMandibular molars-
dc.subjectOsseointegration-
dc.titleThe success rate of immediate implant placement of mandibular molars: A clinical and radiographic retrospective evaluation between 2 and 8 yearsen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionState University of Maringá-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Dentistry State University of Maringá, Maringá-
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Surgery, Aracaju-
dc.description.affiliationIntegrated Clinic São Paulo State University Júlio de Mesquita Filho, Araçatuba-
dc.description.affiliationUnespIntegrated Clinic São Paulo State University Júlio de Mesquita Filho, Araçatuba-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02461.x-
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000319998500014-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito-
dc.relation.ispartofClinical Oral Implants Research-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84878685493-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.