You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/75914
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorScaramucci, Taís-
dc.contributor.authorBorges, Alessandra B.-
dc.contributor.authorLippert, Frank-
dc.contributor.authorFrank, Nathaniel E.-
dc.contributor.authorHara, Anderson T.-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-27T11:29:55Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T18:51:02Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-27T11:29:55Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T18:51:02Z-
dc.date.issued2013-07-04-
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2013.06.004-
dc.identifier.citationArchives of Oral Biology.-
dc.identifier.issn0003-9969-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/75914-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/75914-
dc.description.abstractObjectives: To investigate the effect of fluoride (0, 275 and 1250 ppm F; NaF) in combination with normal and low salivary flow rates on enamel surface loss and fluoride uptake using an erosion-remineralization-abrasion cycling model. Design: Enamel specimens were randomly assigned to 6 experimental groups (n = 8). Specimens were individually placed in custom made devices, creating a sealed chamber on the enamel surface, connected to a peristaltic pump. Citric acid was injected into the chamber for 2 min followed by artificial saliva at 0.5 (normal flow) or 0.05 (low flow) ml/min, for 60 min. This cycle was repeated 4×/day, for 5 days. Toothbrushing with abrasive suspensions containing fluoride was performed for 2 min (15 s of actual brushing) 2×/day. Surface loss was measured by optical profilometry. KOH-soluble fluoride and enamel fluoride uptake were determined after the cycling phase. Data were analysed by two-way ANOVA. Results: No significant interactions between fluoride concentration and salivary flow were observed for any tested variable. Low caused more surface loss than normal flow rate (p < 0.01). At both flow rates, surface loss for 0 was higher than for 275, which did not differ from 1250 ppm F. KOH-soluble and structurally-bound enamel fluoride uptake were significantly different between fluoride concentrations with 1250 > 275 > 0 ppm F (p < 0.01). Conclusions: Sodium fluoride reduced enamel erosion/abrasion, although no additional protection was provided by the higher concentration. Higher erosion progression was observed in low salivary flow rates. Fluoride was not able to compensate for the differences in surface loss between flow rates. © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.en
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.sourceScopus-
dc.subjectDentifrice-
dc.subjectEnamel erosion-
dc.subjectFluoride-
dc.subjectOptical profilometry-
dc.subjectSalivary flow rate-
dc.titleSodium fluoride effect on erosion-abrasion under hyposalivatory simulating conditionsen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.archoralbio.2013.06.004-
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000325236600023-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito-
dc.relation.ispartofArchives of Oral Biology-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84879538839-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.