You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/76394
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRodrigues, Marcus Vinicius Pimenta-
dc.contributor.authorFortaleza, Carlos Magno Castelo Branco-
dc.contributor.authorRiboli, Danilo Flávio Moraes-
dc.contributor.authorRocha, Renata Silveira-
dc.contributor.authorRocha, Cristiane-
dc.contributor.authorCunha, Maria de Lourdes Ribeiro de Souza da-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-27T11:30:32Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T18:53:07Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-27T11:30:32Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T18:53:07Z-
dc.date.issued2013-09-01-
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2013.02.006-
dc.identifier.citationBurns, v. 39, n. 6, p. 1242-1249, 2013.-
dc.identifier.issn0305-4179-
dc.identifier.issn1879-1409-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/76394-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/76394-
dc.description.abstractMethicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) poses a threat for patients in burn units. Studies that mix epidemiological designs with molecular typing may contribute to the development of strategies for MRSA control. We conducted a study including: molecular characterization of Staphylococcal Chromosome Cassette mecA (SCCmec), strain typing with pulsed field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and detection of virulence genes, altogether with a case-case-control study that assessed risk factors for MRSA and for methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA), using S. aureus negative patients as controls. Strains were collected from clinical and surveillance cultures from October 2006 through March 2009. MRSA was isolated from 96 patients. Most isolates (94.8%) harbored SCCmec type III. SCCmec type IV was identified in isolates from four patients. In only one case it could be epidemiologically characterized as community-associated. PFGE typing identified 36 coexisting MRSA clones. When compared to MSSA (38 isolates), MRSA isolates were more likely to harbor two virulence genes: tst and lukPV. Previous stay in other hospital and admission to Intensive Care Unit were independent risk factors for both MRSA and MSSA, while the number of burn wound excisions was significantly related with the former (OR = 6.80, 95%CI = 3.54-13.07). In conclusion, our study found polyclonal endemicity of MRSA in a burn unit, possibly related to importing of strains from other hospitals. Also, it pointed out to a role of surgical procedures in the dissemination of MRSA strains. © 2013 Elsevier Ltd and ISBI. All rights reserved.en
dc.format.extent1242-1249-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.sourceScopus-
dc.subjectMolecular epidemiology-
dc.subjectMRSA burn units-
dc.subjectRisk factors-
dc.subjectStaphylococcus aureus-
dc.subjectamoxicillin plus clavulanic acid-
dc.subjectcefepime-
dc.subjectciprofloxacin-
dc.subjectclindamycin-
dc.subjectgentamicin-
dc.subjectimipenem-
dc.subjectoxacillin-
dc.subjectPanton Valentine leukocidin-
dc.subjectpenicillin binding protein 2a-
dc.subjecttoxic shock syndrome toxin 1-
dc.subjectvancomycin-
dc.subjectadult-
dc.subjectaged-
dc.subjectbacterial chromosome-
dc.subjectbacterial strain-
dc.subjectbacterial virulence-
dc.subjectbacterium culture-
dc.subjectbacterium isolate-
dc.subjectbacterium isolation-
dc.subjectBrazil-
dc.subjectburn-
dc.subjectburn unit-
dc.subjectchild-
dc.subjectcontrolled study-
dc.subjectexcision-
dc.subjectfemale-
dc.subjectgene cassette-
dc.subjecthospital admission-
dc.subjecthospitalization-
dc.subjecthuman-
dc.subjectintensive care unit-
dc.subjectmajor clinical study-
dc.subjectmale-
dc.subjectmethicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus-
dc.subjectmethicillin susceptible Staphylococcus aureus-
dc.subjectmolecular epidemiology-
dc.subjectnonhuman-
dc.subjectpreschool child-
dc.subjectpulsed field gel electrophoresis-
dc.subjectrisk factor-
dc.titleMolecular epidemiology of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a burn unit from Brazilen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Tropical Diseases Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu (Botucatu School of Medicine) Univ Estadual Paulista (São Paulo State University), Botucatu city, São Paulo State-
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology Instituto de Biociências de Botucatu (Botucatu Biosciences Institute) Univ Estadual Paulista (São Paulo State University), Botucatu city, São Paulo State-
dc.description.affiliationBauru State Hospital Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu (Botucatu School of Medicine) Univ Estadual Paulista (São Paulo State University), Bauru City-
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Tropical Diseases Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu (Botucatu School of Medicine) Univ Estadual Paulista (São Paulo State University), Botucatu city, São Paulo State-
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology Instituto de Biociências de Botucatu (Botucatu Biosciences Institute) Univ Estadual Paulista (São Paulo State University), Botucatu city, São Paulo State-
dc.description.affiliationUnespBauru State Hospital Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu (Botucatu School of Medicine) Univ Estadual Paulista (São Paulo State University), Bauru City-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.burns.2013.02.006-
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000324349700031-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito-
dc.relation.ispartofBurns-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84880947171-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.