You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/76441
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAssumpção, Claudio O.-
dc.contributor.authorTibana, Ramires A.-
dc.contributor.authorViana, Luan C.-
dc.contributor.authorWillardson, Jeffrey M.-
dc.contributor.authorPrestes, Jonato-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-27T11:30:33Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T18:53:35Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-27T11:30:33Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T18:53:35Z-
dc.date.issued2013-09-01-
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cpf.12036-
dc.identifier.citationClinical Physiology and Functional Imaging, v. 33, n. 5, p. 359-363, 2013.-
dc.identifier.issn1475-0961-
dc.identifier.issn1475-097X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/76441-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/76441-
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of exercise order on one-repetition maximum (1-RM) and ten-repetition maximum (10-RM) strength gains after 6 weeks of resistance training (RT) in trained men. Sixteen men were randomly assigned into two groups based on the order of exercises performed during training sessions: a group that performed large muscle group exercises first and progressed to small muscle group exercises (LG-SM); while a second group performed the opposite sequence and started with small muscle group exercises and progressed to large muscle group exercises (SM-LG). Four sessions of RT were conducted per week; all exercises were performed for three sets of 8-12 repetitions with 1-min rest intervals between sets. Maximal and submaximal strength were assessed at baseline and after 6 weeks of RT with 1-RM and 10-RM testing for the bench press (BP), lat pulldown (LPD), triceps pulley extension (TE) and biceps curl (BC), respectively. Two-way ANOVA for the 1-RM and 10-RM tests indicated a significant group x time interaction. The 1-RM values significantly increased for all exercises in both groups (P<0.05), but were not significantly different between groups. However, effect size (ES) data indicated that the LG-SM group exhibited a greater magnitude of gains (1-RM and 10-RM) for the BP and LPD exercises. Conversely, ES indicated that the SM-LG group exhibited a greater magnitude of gains (1-RM and 10-RM) for the TE and BC exercises. In conclusion, the results suggest that upper body movements should be prioritized and performed according to individual needs to maximize maximal and submaximal strength. © 2013 Scandinavian Society of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine.en
dc.format.extent359-363-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.sourceScopus-
dc.subjectExercise order-
dc.subjectMuscle force-
dc.subjectRepetitions maximum-
dc.subjectResistance training-
dc.subjectSubmaximal strength-
dc.subjectadult-
dc.subjectanalysis of variance-
dc.subjectbiceps brachii muscle-
dc.subjectbody movement-
dc.subjectbody weight-
dc.subjectcontrolled study-
dc.subjecteffect size-
dc.subjectexercise-
dc.subjecthuman-
dc.subjecthuman experiment-
dc.subjectmale-
dc.subjectmuscle exercise-
dc.subjectmuscle strength-
dc.subjectmuscle training-
dc.subjectnormal human-
dc.subjectpriority journal-
dc.subjectresistance training-
dc.subjectrest-
dc.subjecttriceps brachii muscle-
dc.titleInfluence of exercise order on upper body maximum and submaximal strength gains in trained menen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.contributor.institutionCatholic University of Brasilia-
dc.contributor.institutionEastern Illinois University-
dc.description.affiliationGraduation Program in Human Development and Technologies Human Performance Laboratory São Paulo State University-UNESP, Rio Claro, SP-
dc.description.affiliationGraduation Program on Physical Education Catholic University of Brasilia, Brasilia-
dc.description.affiliationKinesiology and Sports Studies Department Eastern Illinois University, Charleston, IL-
dc.description.affiliationUnespGraduation Program in Human Development and Technologies Human Performance Laboratory São Paulo State University-UNESP, Rio Claro, SP-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/cpf.12036-
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000321963000005-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito-
dc.relation.ispartofClinical Physiology and Functional Imaging-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84880698267-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.