You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/76473
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSantamaria, Mauro Pedrine-
dc.contributor.authorFeitosa, Daniela da Silva-
dc.contributor.authorCasati, Marcio Zaffalon-
dc.contributor.authorNociti Júnior, Francisco Humberto-
dc.contributor.authorSallum, Antônio Wilson-
dc.contributor.authorSallum, Enilson Antônio-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-27T11:30:35Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T18:53:42Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-27T11:30:35Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T18:53:42Z-
dc.date.issued2013-09-01-
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1902/jop.2013.120447-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Periodontology, v. 84, n. 9, 2013.-
dc.identifier.issn0022-3492-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/76473-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/76473-
dc.description.abstractBackground: The aim of this clinical study is to evaluate the 2-year term results of gingival recession (GR) associated with non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs) treated by connective tissue graft (CTG) alone or in combination with a resin-modified glass ionomer restoration (CTG+R). Methods: Thirty-six patients with Miller Class I buccal GR associated with NCCLs completed the follow-up. The defects were randomly assigned to receive either CTG or CTG+R. Bleeding on probing (BOP), probing depth (PD), relative GR, clinical attachment level (CAL), and cervical lesion height coverage were measured at baseline, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after treatment. Results: Both groups showed statistically significant gains in CAL and soft-tissue coverage. The differences between groups were not statistically significant in BOP, PD, relative GR, or CAL after 2 years. Cervical lesion height coverage was 79.31% ± 18.51% for CTG and 71.95% ± 13.25% for CTG+R (P >0.05). Estimated root coverage was 91.56% ± 11.74% for CTG and 93.29% ± 7.97% for CTG+R (P ≥0.05). Conclusions: Within the limits of the present study, it can be concluded that both procedures provide comparable soft tissue coverage after 2 years of follow-up.en
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.sourceScopus-
dc.subjectDental esthetics-
dc.subjectDental restoration-
dc.subjectGingival recession-
dc.subjectGlass ionomer cements-
dc.subjectPermanent-
dc.subjectTooth abrasion-
dc.subjectTooth cervix-
dc.titleRandomized controlled clinical trial evaluating connective tissue graft plus resin-modified glass ionomer restoration for the treatment of gingival recession associated with non-carious cervical lesion: 2-year follow-upen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade de Pernambuco (UPE)-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)-
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Periodontology College of Dentistry State University of São Paulo, Av. Eng. Francisco José Longo, 777, São José dos Campos, SP, CEP. 12245-000-
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Oral Medicine Pernambuco Dental School University of Pernambuco, Recife, PE-
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Prosthodontics and Periodontics Piracicaba Dental School University of Campinas, São Paulo-
dc.identifier.doi10.1902/jop.2013.120447-
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000328685400001-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Periodontology-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84883426953-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.