Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/9438
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Marins Chiaradia, Ana Paula | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kuga, Helio Koiti | - |
dc.contributor.author | Bertachini de Almeida Prado, Antonio Fernando | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-05-20T13:28:22Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2014-05-20T13:28:22Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2012-01-01 | - |
dc.identifier | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/768973 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Mathematical Problems In Engineering. New York: Hindawi Publishing Corporation, p. 12, 2012. | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1024-123X | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11449/9438 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Two methods to evaluate the state transition matrix are implemented and analyzed to verify the computational cost and the accuracy of both methods. This evaluation represents one of the highest computational costs on the artificial satellite orbit determination task. The first method is an approximation of the Keplerian motion, providing an analytical solution which is then calculated numerically by solving Kepler's equation. The second one is a local numerical approximation that includes the effect of J(2). The analysis is performed comparing these two methods with a reference generated by a numerical integrator. For small intervals of time (1 to 10s) and when one needs more accuracy, it is recommended to use the second method, since the CPU time does not excessively overload the computer during the orbit determination procedure. For larger intervals of time and when one expects more stability on the calculation, it is recommended to use the first method. | en |
dc.description.sponsorship | UNESP (Universidade Estadual Paulista Julio de Mesquita Filho) of Brazil | - |
dc.description.sponsorship | INPE (Brazilian Institute for Space Research) | - |
dc.format.extent | 12 | - |
dc.language.iso | eng | - |
dc.publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation | - |
dc.source | Web of Science | - |
dc.title | Comparison between Two Methods to Calculate the Transition Matrix of Orbit Motion | en |
dc.type | outro | - |
dc.contributor.institution | Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) | - |
dc.contributor.institution | Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE) | - |
dc.description.affiliation | FEG UNESP, Grp Dinam Orbital & Planetol, Dept Math, BR-12516410 Guaratingueta, SP, Brazil | - |
dc.description.affiliation | DEM INPE, BR-12227010 Sao Jose Dos Campos, SP, Brazil | - |
dc.description.affiliationUnesp | FEG UNESP, Grp Dinam Orbital & Planetol, Dept Math, BR-12516410 Guaratingueta, SP, Brazil | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1155/2012/768973 | - |
dc.identifier.wos | WOS:000298629200001 | - |
dc.rights.accessRights | Acesso aberto | - |
dc.identifier.file | WOS000298629200001.pdf | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Mathematical Problems in Engineering | - |
Appears in Collections: | Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp |
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.